In this continuing series, I will share the book I am currently reading and invite others to read it, and have a discussion below. Remember, no spoilers. I chose this book because I have heard, like many books, that this one suffers much from over-saturation in our culture and that it is a classic for a reason, dealing with issues of scientific hubris and ethical concerns that were very prescient. I’ve read the letters that begin the story and I am really enjoying it so far. There is something about 19th century writing that is so precise and beguiling. Let me know what you think.
This is Mary Shelley…she finished writing Frankenstein when she was 21 years old…mind blowing.
The more I awaken to the world I live in, the more I find it impossible to stand idly by while enslavement of my fellow human beings happens at an escalating rate. There are those in the polite society I have somehow found myself in, who urge me to focus on my own success…who see in my compassion a kind of ‘backwardness’…and they forget that I did not grow up in this polite society. I grew up very much among the poor, and so I know just a little bit about this world, and if the freedom I’ve found means anything, it means I have the duty to speak up, to have the audacity to care about those who live in cages. The internet, much like the printing press did in the 15th century, is providing a window of opportunity for us to liberate ourselves from the lies that keep us bound and silent.
After watching the video interview of Chris Hedges, and reading the follow up letter by David Graeber (both below) concerning the Black Bloc occupy tactics, I wrote my own open letter. Please share.
Open Letter to David Graeber and Chris Hedges
Dear Distinguished Dudes,
As a member of this ‘struggle’ I cannot help but see in the debate you both articulate something fallacious from the outset, something I am going to speculate comes from being too informed by history, the result of over-education. This is not meant to be disrespectful. I have a deep admiration for both of you, but that admiration must be put aside in order to speak to my own vision of what is occurring.
First of all, the whole notion of ‘what works’ is not grounded in any finalized notion of the object or goal that makes efficacy of any sort possible to measure. The diversity of tactics cannot be confused with diversity of aims, and I think that is exactly what is occurring.
1. Hilarious parody of the new Tom Hanks movie I have no interest in seeing…dealing with 911 issues, and the madness caused by thinking too much about the anomalous nature of those events.
2. More seriously, if you are interested in hacking, and what it means to the unfolding of the 21st century society, here is a recording made by Anonymous, who were able to hack into an FBI conference call, and listen into the investigation of themselves…they later posted it. Read the NYTimes article here.
If you will watch the video, you will conclude, i hope, as I have, that our president is lying to us…that he is misrepresenting something that is fatal…his ineloquence is symptomatic of the difficult role presidents face today of speaking without saying anything…it is more difficult than one might assume…
Look at his first statement:
“i wanna make sure that people understand actually drones have not caused a HUGE number of casualties…for the most part….”
(are there other words, like ‘significant’, or ‘many’ that can be used in the place of HUGE..and what is the definition of HUGE…and ‘for the most part’…what about the times that are not included in that statement?)
Here are another few words I find distastefully ‘folksy’ regarding an issue that should be handled with the utmost articulation:
willy nilly
and so on…
tight leash…
it’s not uhh a bunch of folks in a room somewhere just makin decisions…
And of course, the final heavy moment of this video…it is difficult to stomach, and feels like it is heavy-handed by the editor…but then again, shouldn’t it be?
Akbar Lightning is a process I use to explore self-realization.
Such processes require outside perspectives. So I invite you to participate, critique, engage, contribute, or simply enjoy.
Comment areas are places for discussion, argumentation, dialectic, praise, dissent, etc. The only comments removed will be those deemed hateful/destructive or spam. Other than that I welcome naysayers as well as fans. Teach me!