In this series, I will make predictions about the cultural changes that will make this century distinct from the last.
The skyscraper represents the 20th Century the way the pyramids represented the ancient Egyptian empires. The skyscraper will be replaced in the 21st Century by community systems. As communities begin to experiment with lifestyles that are both sustainable and enriching, they will discover styles emerging…self-contained ecosystems that will become symbols of the new spirit. As we watch the Freedom Tower being built in downtown New York City, we already see its impermanence, simply as a result of our lack of investment in that archetype for power. It does not inspire us in the same way that it might have 20 years ago. In fact, it seems tragic.
Last night I was feeling melancholic…this is rare these days…I am usually a happy ole chap…but I am familiar with the feeling…I have swum in its waters enough in my life to know when my feet are wet. After my family went to sleep I decided to put down my work and look for a movie, and I saw Melancholia had been added to Netflix, and I accidentally engaged in the solution to melancholic emotions which is to enter into them, and let yourself get swept away, in order to find out what is haunting you. It is always risky, but melancholy is made more painful by trying to run from it, as illustrated by this movie.
I am cautious with the films of Lars Von Trier because, as an artist, I am optimistic, and he is a director that investigates aspects of the soul that tend toward fatalism, and although I understand the logic of fatalism, I believe there is a further step one can take in response to meaninglessness, which is to make value-laden choices, if only to have more fun. The alternative, which is to remain in the truth of nihilism, is a kind of value choice, and therefore its own kind of meaning. But this has nothing to do with the film, this is expressing the perspective I bring to his movies. Nonetheless, after seeing Dogville a few years back, I respect him as a person of great depth.
This movie is beautiful and belongs to that minority of films that I will call, for want of a better word, classical. Its images are crisp and stunning and sparse. The casting is perfect. Kirsten Dunst is part of a duo representing 2 aspects of the melancholic perspective with her counterpart Charlotte Gainsbourg…they are both acting at the highest level possible…wow! But I don’t want to talk too much about mechanics…I am not a film guy, I’m an ideas guy. Suffice it to say, that the craftsmanship is as close to flawless as they come. More importantly, this is a work about melancholy, but not as a mood, as I was experiencing it last night, but as a perspective, as a way of seeing reality, and the argument it makes is profoundly convincing, and this will haunt me for some time. I recognized myself in the characters who played more deluded forms of melancholy, and this is Lars Von Trier’s greatest trick in the film…Even though Dunst’s initial narrative has moments of fascinating heroics, that have to do with accepting her melancholic tendencies, much to the dissatisfaction of society, she becomes a ‘straight-man’ to the more nuanced forms represented by the character of her sister, and her tirelessly optimistic brother-in-law. As someone who relishes movies that utilize metaphor to grapple with the universal human condition, I savored the use of a second planet that might, or might not, collide with Earth…and I interpreted this as the world we have built, the mechanized Western Enlightenment coming to grips with itself…I don’t want to push this point too hard, but there is a feeling captured in this film that will be known to everybody trying simply to relate to one another in a world where every human being has a different opinion on the smallest moments of social exchange…it is exhausting, and this exhaustion is made palpable in this film. Simple people might label a movie like this as ‘depressing’, but that is because they lack a range of emotion that makes viewing this film possible. It is not depressing at all, in fact I found it exhilarating precisely because it confronted speech, that medium through which we lie, but do so to hide from our feelings. This movie lays that bare and finds a way around it, but a way known only to ancient Greeks and the Romantics…and that way is catharsis…I cannot think of any other movie that offers such a pure experience of this Greek concept…never have I seen tragedy that convinced me more of the power of love, in its most paradoxical sense. This is a truly great film.
Our feelings about animals and industry are not solely about the animals. No, the rising distaste surrounding our treatment of animals in the meat industry reflects our own experiences within a world of concrete and steel. Humans are shuttled to and fro within a mechanized world that extracts their life essence to unknown ends, in ways not unlike the life of the industrial cow or chicken. This is another example of the growing tension between the divinity of nature and natural systems and the hardness and efficiency of the machine. Many think that the Machine War exists in some science fiction future, but I have said this before, the Machine War is happening right now. Arguments can be made, and sometimes are made, to support the machine, as either opposed to nature, or a new form of it. And it is important to have explicit conversations about this binary reality, for there are some compromises that might have to be accepted. However, the rampant unconsciousness with which people resign themselves to penned-in machine lives, is evidence of the Machine exercising in ways that are not honorable, in the old sense of that word. The chicken I eat may be free range, but am I free range? That is the question.
The artistry and elegance involved in the precise yanking of a toilet paper roll, the tearing and poetry of the folding that follows, the origamic diversity of heuristically derived forms, utilized to a foul but efficiency-driven endeavor, however pure it might be prior to its end, is hidden from the world of ideas, from the graces of culture, due to an instinctual and appropriate revulsion toward shit.
Most of the things about me some consider great exist because of some neglected responsibility. I was thinking of my wife this morning and how we met, working together for a week at a camp for underprivileged children. That whole week was spent neglecting my duties in favor of pursuing the object of my desire, an overwhelming desire that I would come to interpret as the signal of my true love. So, this great family that I cherish began with an abrogation of duty. So too, the artistic creations that have gained me respect have benefited from the neglect of financial responsibilities, by all the years I spent pridefully rejecting the claims made on me by student loan agencies. I consciously refused to give to them my life force so that I could continue what I felt was my rightful vocation. Toward this end I exercised all sorts of social improprieties. I used places of employment for my own needs. I’ve stolen office supplies. But more importantly I stole time, I took corporate time and made it mine. I show very little respect for the values of my society, when by some justification, I feel my own values are of a higher nature. In all instances I was graced/cursed with a heightened sense of entitlement. I cannot explain this, but I feel comfortable admitting it, and pondering it as the ironic source of all the richness and security I now enjoy. It is either a deeply troubling character flaw or the nexus of my deepest wisdom.
I posit that the following video is to our time what Plato’s dialogues were to his. The use of video allows for a kind of perfect reading that was impossible in earlier times, giving us a chance to meditate not just on the words spoken but the interpersonal dynamics, the subtext, that will make the philosophy of our time unique. This is a masterpiece of dialogue between two skillful shamans.
Akbar Lightning is a process I use to explore self-realization.
Such processes require outside perspectives. So I invite you to participate, critique, engage, contribute, or simply enjoy.
Comment areas are places for discussion, argumentation, dialectic, praise, dissent, etc. The only comments removed will be those deemed hateful/destructive or spam. Other than that I welcome naysayers as well as fans. Teach me!